Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
James Kent Trotter vs James McCabe Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Trotter vs McCabe analysis and find out who is favored!
James Kent Trotter vs James McCabe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Trotter 1 - 1 McCabe
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Trotter has won 49.79% of points on his second serve, while McCabe has won 52.7%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Trotter, in recent form, has won 44.3% of his opponent's second serve points, while McCabe has won 45.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.85% and 32.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Trotter has saved 61.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas McCabe has saved 62.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Trotter has won 56.14% of matches played (W/L 32/ 25), with McCabe winning 51.72% (W/L 30/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Trotter has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 20/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). McCabe has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 87/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Trotter has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56% of matches (W/L 28/ 22), where as McCabe has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 20/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Trotter winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Trotter winning 3 and McCabe winning 2. The last match between Trotter and McCabe was at the Wuxi Challenger, 06-05-2024, Q3, Hard with James McCabe getting the victory 6-4 3-6 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:8:59.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Trotter and McCabe have played a deciding set 1 times, with Trotter winning 0 times and McCabe 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Trotter winning 1, and McCabe 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Trotter has played against opponents with an average rank of 309.44 while McCabe has played against players with an average rank of 210.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Trotter has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while McCabe has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Trotter has converted 41.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and McCabe has converted 41.07% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
371
Rank
371
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
342
Rank
258
High
20
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
56% (62-48)
Career Total W/L
59% (105-74)
52% (13-12)
YTD W/L
57% (20-15)
$0
Career Prize Money
$17,900
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | James Kent Trotter | James McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 29 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 13 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:59 | 2:8:59 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (94/174) | 54% (87/161) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (69/94) | 66% (57/87) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (43/80) | 54% (40/74) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 54% (7/13) | 36% (5/14) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (64/161) | 36% (62/174) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 7-6(4) |
Stats 
James McCabe
Player
James Kent Trotter
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
105)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
| 7-6(8) 6-2 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
James McCabe
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | James Kent Trotter | James McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (13/12) | 57% (20/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (27/26) | 54% (44/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (282/257) | 53% (413/369) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 55% (16/13) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.72 | 0.65 |
| Aces Total | 191 | 249 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 83 | 76 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:21 | 1:50:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 293.08 | 191.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (951/1638) | 59% (1464/2464) |
| 1st Serve W% | 77% (731/951) | 72% (1051/1464) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (346/687) | 53% (527/1000) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (48/115) | 41% (92/224) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (539/1544) | 37% (916/2472) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (13/12) | 63% (12/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (12/24) | 58% (19/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 33% (6/18) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 60% (6/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 95% (19/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 5% (19/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 13% (16/2) |
James Kent Trotter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
James Kent Trotter
72%
(
63 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
10
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Hikaru Shiraishi
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
12
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
James Kent Trotter
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
105)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Alafia Ayeni
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Moez Echargui
Player
James Kent Trotter
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
4
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
James Kent Trotter
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Hiroki Moriya
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
11
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
91%
(
31 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Yanki Erel
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
James Kent Trotter
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
4
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
7
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
James McCabe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
James McCabe
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
62 of
97)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
James McCabe
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
James Kent Trotter
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
105)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Jose Statham
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
James McCabe
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
6-1 6-7(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Egor Gerasimov
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
12
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
32 of
36)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
15 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Federico Bondioli
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
James McCabe
56%
(
59 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
40 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(6) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Li Tu
59%
(
63 of
106)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Trotter Vs McCabe Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
